Math, ML & Risk Modeling
lead or applied mathematicianOwn the decision engine itself — how deterioration is separated from noise, how winnability is judged, and how confidence is bounded so it never overstates.
Most AI products are built to look confident. We are building one whose main job is knowing when not to act — and proving every claim back to a record. That constraint is the whole engineering problem, and it's why this is interesting.
Every number the product shows traces to the record it came from. No score without a cause, no cause without a source.
The product says "don't bother" as often as "act now" — and that discipline is what makes anyone believe the flags.
Small team, private rollout, founders in the deployment calls. You will talk to the people using what you build.
If none of these fit but you think you should be here, apply to the last one and tell us why.
Own the decision engine itself — how deterioration is separated from noise, how winnability is judged, and how confidence is bounded so it never overstates.
Build the pipelines that turn messy customer systems into evidence with lineage. If a claim can't be traced to a record, it doesn't ship.
The workspace where a human reads a call and approves a save. Dense, fast, and legible under pressure — closer to a trading terminal than a dashboard.
Get a real customer from a CSV to a first save inside one working session, then bring back everything that made it hard.
Sell a product that tells buyers when not to act. Founder-led motion, technical buyers, honest claims only.
Explain a decision engine without hype. The bar is the site you're reading: specific, evidenced, no invented statistics.